Naar de inhoud
Steven’s StudyHub

Lecture 1B: Common mistakes and summary

How to use this chapter

This is the place to come back to before the exam. Each mistake below is one that students actually make under time pressure. For every item, cover the right-hand side, say the correct version out loud, and only then read on. If one of them surprises you, go back to the chapter it refers to: the whole of Lecture 1 is only ten short pages.

Common mistakes

  • Confusing CA and TB: the trade balance is only one part of the current account.
  • Confusing flows and stocks: the CA is a yearly flow; the NIIP is a stock at a moment in time.
  • Thinking ΔNIIP always equals the CA: valuation changes can be larger than the CA.
  • Thinking a bilateral deficit is the problem: the total CA depends on saving minus investment, not on one trading partner.
  • Forgetting the real rate in the Taylor principle: what matters is whether the nominal rate rises by more than inflation.
  • Mixing up the floor and the ceiling: the deposit rate is the floor, the lending rate the ceiling.

Summary

  • Central banks steer one short-term interest rate. They keep the market rate inside a corridor between their deposit rate (floor) and lending rate (ceiling); the floor leaks because non-banks lack access (the Fed fixes this with the ON RRP). With ample reserves after QE, they set the rate (price) directly instead of the quantity of reserves.
  • The Fed has a dual mandate (jobs and prices, 2% PCE); the ECB a primary objective (prices, 2% HICP, symmetric).
  • The Taylor rule i = r* + π + 0.5(π − π*) + 0.5y describes policy; the Taylor principle demands an inflation coefficient above 1. Its prescription depends strongly on the inflation measure, r*, the gap and smoothing.
  • Global imbalances: the US is a large net debtor; Germany, Japan and China are large net creditors.
  • Balance of payments: current account + capital account = financial account. CA = TB + income balance + net unilateral transfers; for most countries the TB dominates.
  • NIIP = A − L; it changes through the CA and through valuation changes (exchange rates and asset prices), which have become large because gross positions grew.
  • The NIIP-NII paradox (US: NIIP < 0, NII > 0) is explained by dark matter or return differentials (exorbitant privilege); China shows the inverted paradox.
  • Next lecture: the New Keynesian model and why the Taylor rule approximates optimal policy; later, whether current account deficits are sustainable.

Andere hoofdstukken van International Monetary Relations and Policy

Test jezelf met oefenvragen